IBIS Macromodel Task Group Meeting date: 27 Nov 2012 Members (asterisk for those attending): Agilent: * Fangyi Rao * Radek Biernacki Altera: * David Banas Julia Liu Hazlina Ramly Andrew Joy Consulting: Andy Joy ANSYS: Samuel Mertens * Dan Dvorscak * Curtis Clark Steve Pytel * Luis Armenta Arrow Electronics: Ian Dodd Cadence Design Systems: Terry Jernberg * Ambrish Varma Feras Al-Hawari Brad Brim Kumar Keshavan Ken Willis Cavium Networks: Johann Nittmann Celsionix: Kellee Crisafulli Cisco Systems: Ashwin Vasudevan Syed Huq Ericsson: Anders Ekholm IBM: Greg Edlund Intel: * Michael Mirmak Maxim Integrated Products: Mahbubul Bari Hassan Rafat Ron Olisar Mentor Graphics: * John Angulo Zhen Mu * Arpad Muranyi Vladimir Dmitriev-Zdorov Micron Technology: Randy Wolff Justin Butterfield NetLogic Microsystems: Ryan Couts Nokia-Siemens Networks: Eckhard Lenski QLogic Corp. James Zhou SiSoft: * Walter Katz Todd Westerhoff Doug Burns * Mike LaBonte Snowbush IP: Marcus Van Ierssel ST Micro: Syed Sadeghi Teraspeed Consulting Group: Scott McMorrow Bob Ross TI: Casey Morrison Alfred Chong Vitesse Semiconductor: Eric Sweetman Xilinx: Mustansir Fanaswalla Ray Anderson The meeting was led by Arpad Muranyi ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Opens: - Arpad: We will have 3 meetings in December -------------------------- Call for patent disclosure: - None ------------- Review of ARs: - Walter provide better explanation for intrinsic parameters in BIRD 150 draft - Done - Arpad to send BIRD 121.2 to Open Forum - Done, posted to IBIS website - Fangyi, Mahbubul, et. al., to discuss merging their "Redriver" proposal with BIRD 131. - In progress ------------- New Discussion: Interconnect report: - MM: EMD can be used to address packaging - Investigating use of parameter tree format for this - Walter: It was suggested that we do EMD first, then the .ibs part for packaging BIRD 150: - Arpad showed BIRD_150.1_draft5 - Arpad: Dependency_Table is not actually a parameter, needs new terminology - Mike: It could be called a "construct" - Radek: It actually is a parameter - Arpad: It is not sent to the DLL - Fangyi: Is it stated the this is not part of the DLL input? - Arpad: It does not have it's own Format like parameters, it inherits other Formats - Fangyi: Mainly it is not used by the model, doesn't completely belong in the AMI file - Ambrish: We should say the Usage Decency_Table is not sent to the DLL - Arpad: Can we change the part about "easier for the systems designer"? - Walter: It is "easier for parameter relationships to be programmatically defined" - Arpad: Is the "Labels row" section left over? We have no labels. - Walter: Page 4 describes parameter names - Arpad: "for that Parameter based" is an incomplete fragment - Walter: "based" should go away - Curtis: "parameters defined in the table" should be "parameters used in the table" - Arpad: The Out_Match description is hard to understand - Walter explained Out_Closest, Out_Range, Out_PWL. - Arpad: The "must contain numeric data" phrase suddenly introduces numeric data in a section about exact matching - Radek: The paragraph should be moved after the definitions. - Mike: This must be written so that it can be read with fewer questions. - Arpad: What is the "equal choices" sentence for? - Walter: To choose which way to go when the input value is halfway between two choices - Fangyi: There could be a platform precision issue - Arpad: The language needs to be clearer - Arpad: "numerically larger row" needs to be clearer - Mike: "larger" should be "greater" - Arpad: What is the note about "intrinsic" here? - Walter: The definition is "Belonging to the essential nature or constitution of a thing" - Walter explained the intrinsic reserved parameters - Arpad: bit_time should not be allowed to be zero - Walter: Agree, BAUD is in the same category - Fangyi: Does Corner apply to things other than AMI parameters? - I have have some parameters at min, others at max - Walter: No, one corner is used for all parameters, but the value arrangement can be different - Fangyi: "If these parameters were specified" is confusing - Walter: Agree - Arpad: The Type line is not needed - Walter: Agree - Fangyi: What is Model_Name? - Walter: It is a parameter defined above - Radek: "intrinsic" still may not be right - Fangyi: They really are simulator parameters, not model parameters ------------- Next meeting: 4 Dec 2012 12:00pm PT Next agenda: 1) Task list item discussions ------------- IBIS Interconnect SPICE Wish List: 1) Simulator directives